🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from violence, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this week to oppose the vote. The final authority now lies with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

Latvia has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a significant setback for gender equality.

Political Debate and Opposition

The treaty was ratified by the European Union in last year, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on gender equality weakens family values and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that violence does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "gender ideology with multiple sexes".

The nation's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be made political, while the group the rights organization stated it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has sparked widespread protest both within the country and abroad.

22,000 individuals have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the wishes of the nation's citizens.

Global Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by false information. He described it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further review if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics announced on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the reformist party, indicated it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU nations
• The European treaty requires specific legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in additional EU countries